Search

Who's Online

We have 20 guests and no members online

Speed Camera Locations

Australian Speed Camera Locations

GhostPlate™
Watch the Video

 


Super Protector GhostPlate™

 

Ghostplates number plate covers - Help Save Your Licence

GhostPlates™ number plate covers are designed stop photographs of your licence plate from special angles designed into the composite clear plastic covers.

Four different types of number plate cover are available.


GhostPlates™ Laser Shield


 

Ghostplates number plate covers - Help Save Your Licence

GhostPlates™ laser shield is designed to reduce the laser return signature from your front number plate. Police Officer aim their laser speed guns at the most reflective part of the front of your vehicle. Usually the front number plate. When used with a BLINDER laser jammer, your chances of getting a laser based speeding ticket are hugely reduced.

GhostPlates are your Best Defensive Aid on the market today. Find out how well they work!



 

BLINDER'S  STEALTH SPEED GUN JAMMER

 

 

BLINDER laser jammers are designed to mimic police laser guns and laser speed cameras to save you from a nasty speeding fine.Find out how well they work!

 


Get_the BLINDER_M27 Model

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BLINDER M27 & M47 also work against the Vitronic Poliscan Speed Laser Speed Camera. Free Software upgrades for life.


 

 

BLINDER Anti-Laser Gun System

 

BLINDER laser jammers are designed to mimic police laser guns and laser speed cameras to save you from a nasty speeding fine.Find out how well they work!

 

BLINDER Laser Jammers fit neatly into the cars bodywork

BLINDER laser jammers are designed to mimic police laser guns & speed cameras. Designed  to give you the few seconds needed  to get down to the speed limit. Highly effective blocking system that when used correctly will never bee detected.

 


 

 

Statistics

Articles View Hits
88269

Class-action suit brewing over red-light cameras

VICTORVILLE • A local attorney has sent notice (click here to read the notice) that he intends to file a class action lawsuit against the city of Victorville and Redflex Traffic Systems unless changes are made with the way red-light cameras are handled here.

Robert Conaway, a criminal defense attorney from Barstow, is demanding that the two parties stop issuing tickets and that Redflex let Victorville out of its red-light camera contract. Otherwise, Conaway said he will sue unless the city begins paying San Bernardino County Sheriff’s deputies to watch the live video feed and issue tickets as they occur, then appear in court to testify regarding the violations.

The request stems from the primary concern cited by Conaway, local tea party members and others who’ve risen up to oppose the cameras: that they violate civil rights because the accused don’t have the opportunity to confront their accuser. And, since employees with Redflex — a private company headquartered in Phoenix — are the ones first viewing the alleged violations, opponents claim testimony from local deputies should be inadmissible as evidence.

Conaway filed the suit on behalf of Victorville resident Michael Curran “and others.” Curran, 62, is accused of running the red light at Bear Valley and Hesperia roads on Sept. 26. He has no previous violations in San Bernardino County, according to court records.

The city and Redflex have 30 days to respond to the notice. Conaway declined to answer further questions until he receives their responses.

“We are confident that any action at this point is without merit,” Tom Herrmann, Redflex spokesman, said Tuesday by phone from the company’s Phoenix headquarters.

Herrmann declined to discuss specifics of the claim without having seen the suit, which Conaway sent Friday.

“We are unaware of any courts in California that have deemed use of red-light cameras unconstitutional at this time,” Victorville City Attorney Andre de Bortnoswky said via email Tuesday. “Nevertheless, we will review and research the theories raised and respond accordingly.”

Victorville isn’t particularly pleased with how the red-light cameras have worked out either, with city officials citing the “excessive” $490 fine and a questionable correlation to increased safety at most monitored intersections.

In March, a split City Council approved a partnership between the city attorney’s office and local attorney Brandon Wood to explore strategies for terminating Victorville’s contract with Redflex before it expires in 2014. They’d hoped to have an answer within 60 days, but nine months have passed without any indication Victorville can terminate its contract for 10 red-light cameras without facing litigation from Redflex.

Brooke Edwards Staggs may be reached at (760) 955-5358 or at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .